The 10 Worst Sailboats Ever Sold in the U.S.

Not every boat that’s ever splashed into American waters was a masterpiece of naval architecture. For every timeless design like a J/24 or Catalina 30, there were clunkers that left their owners swearing off sailing altogether. During the big fiberglass boom from the 1960s through the 1990s, manufacturers churned out hundreds of models in the race to make sailing accessible to the masses. While many were solid, affordable little cruisers and racers, others were…well, disasters.

Some were flimsy, some were painfully slow, and some were downright unsafe. These were the boats that sent owners back to the dealership muttering “never again,” or left sailors stranded on sandbars wondering why they didn’t just buy a canoe. If you’ve ever cursed at a poorly-designed cockpit, a floppy mast, or a boat that handled like a refrigerator, you know the feeling.

Here’s a tour through the 10 worst production sailboats ever sold in the United States—a hall of shame featuring the AquaCat, the Snark, the infamous MacGregor 26X, and seven more that gave sailors nightmares.

---

1. Allstar AquaCat 12.5

Marketed as a fun little beach cat, the AquaCat 12.5 looked like a cousin of the Hobie 16 but sailed like a soggy air mattress. Owners complained that the stubby hulls sat so low in the water they were almost submerged before you even stepped aboard. Add a flimsy A-frame mast support that warped the sail shape, and the result was a boat that was neither fast nor fun.

Sailors joked that it was better suited as lawn furniture than a serious boat. Tack one in a stiff breeze, and you’d discover quickly that “agility” wasn’t in its vocabulary. If you were under 100 pounds and sailing in a pond, it might have been okay—but for everyone else, the AquaCat was a catamaran in name only.

---

2. Super Snark (9′ Snark)

Ah, the Snark. Sold at Sears, Kmart, and even through mail-order catalogs, this styrofoam dinghy introduced thousands of people to sailing. Unfortunately, it also soured plenty on the sport.

The Snark was literally a chunk of molded styrofoam with a thin plastic skin. That meant it was light to cartop, but also fragile enough to dent or crack if you looked at it the wrong way. The spars were little more than aluminum poles, and the sail was about as efficient as a bed sheet. Worse, it was unsafe in anything above 10 knots of wind—capsizing was basically a guarantee.

Yes, the Snark was cheap, and yes, it floated. But sailing one was slow, uncomfortable, and often humiliating as even paddleboards passed you by. It’s no wonder many sailors say their Snark “sailed like a cooler lid.”

---

3. MacGregor 26X (1996–2004)

Few boats are as polarizing as the MacGregor 26X. Billed as a “powersailer,” it could supposedly cruise under sail or zip along at 20 mph with a 50-hp outboard. The problem? It didn’t do either job well.

Under sail, the flat, lightweight hull and water ballast system made it tender and twitchy. Upwind performance was dismal, and the boat was prone to sliding sideways in gusts. Under power, it was faster than most sailboats but still handled like a bathtub. Worst of all, safety was a real concern: at least one 26X capsized with 10 people aboard, causing fatalities.

To be fair, the MacGregor 26 line introduced many families to the water. But among experienced sailors, the 26X became infamous as a floating compromise that proved you can’t be both a motorboat and a sailboat without sacrificing the best of both worlds.

---

4. Bayliner Buccaneer 240 (Buccaneer 24)

Bayliner is best known for powerboats, and their foray into sailboats left much to be desired. The Buccaneer 24, designed to maximize cabin space, wound up being more like a floating RV than a sailboat.

Its heavy, slab-sided hull paired with a tiny rig made for sluggish performance. Try tacking one upwind and you’d swear you were dragging an anchor. Add in construction shortcuts—thin fiberglass, cheap fittings, and plywood that rotted quickly—and you had a boat that might work for a weekend picnic but failed miserably as a sailboat.

---

5. Bayliner Buccaneer 270 (Buccaneer 27)

Take all the problems of the 24, make it bigger, and you’ve got the Buccaneer 27. Roomier, yes. Faster, no. Stronger, not really.

With lots of volume below and very little sail area above, the 27 felt like sailing a minivan. Owners who bought one for the big cabin often found themselves stuck in the slow lane on the water. Even kayakers could pass them in light air. While the boat provided affordable family cruising accommodations, its sailing performance was so poor it often ended up as a floating condo instead of a vessel that could actually take you anywhere.

---

6. Lockley/Newport 17

Sometimes the bargain price tag tells the whole story. The Newport 17 was known as the “Dodge Aries of sailboats”—cheap, functional enough to move, but stripped of every refinement.

The hull was thin, the fittings crude, and storage space nonexistent. In light air, it barely moved; in chop, it slammed like a jackhammer. It was the kind of boat that looked okay in the sales brochure but left owners disappointed the first time they hit open water.

---

7. Etap 21

On paper, the Etap 21 was brilliant: a small cruiser with a foam-filled double hull that made it “unsinkable.” In reality, it proved that being unsinkable doesn’t mean being enjoyable.

The Etap suffered from poor handling, leaky hatches, and flimsy fittings. Its sailing performance was stiff and uninspiring, and while owners loved the idea of safety, many hated everything else about the experience. It was a clever concept that stumbled in execution—an unsinkable boat that no one wanted to sail.

---

8. Coronado 25

Built during the peak of the fiberglass boom, the Coronado 25 looked like a decent little family cruiser. Unfortunately, many were plagued with serious structural issues. Soft decks, leaky hull-to-deck joints, corroded keel bolts—surveyors still cringe when they see one.

Instead of spending weekends sailing, many Coronado owners found themselves on a first-name basis with fiberglass repair kits. Some are still out there, patched and re-patched, but as a production design, the Coronado 25 became a cautionary tale of cost-cutting gone wrong.

---

9. Paceship PY26

Canadian-built Paceships found their way into the U.S. market as affordable family cruisers. Unfortunately, their affordability came at a high cost later.

The PY26 in particular is known for cheap materials, leaky bulkheads, and decks prone to warping. Delamination is common, and many owners spend more time fixing issues than sailing. For those who wanted a budget boat, it seemed like a good deal—until the maintenance bills piled up.

---

10. Chrysler (Newport/Neptune models)

In the 1970s, Chrysler tried to cash in on the sailboat craze with models like the Newport 30 and Neptune 22. The results? A fleet of boats plagued with cracks, leaks, and outdated designs.

Chrysler’s assembly-line approach worked for cars, but not so much for boats. These sailboats often aged poorly, and today many are considered more liability than classic. They’re a reminder that mass production and good sailing rarely go hand in hand.

---

Conclusion

If you owned one of these boats, don’t worry—you’re not alone. Plenty of sailors cut their teeth on Snarks or AquaCats and lived to tell the tale. In fact, for many, those “bad boats” provided the first taste of freedom on the water. But when judged by design, construction, and safety, these ten stand out as the worst production sailboats ever sold in the United States.

The takeaway? A low price or clever marketing pitch can hide a lot of sins. Some boats were slow, some were fragile, and some were just plain dangerous. But they all share one thing: they taught sailors to appreciate the difference between a real sailboat and a floating disappointment. And maybe that’s their lasting legacy—sometimes, learning what not to buy is just as valuable as finding the boat of your dreams.